Wednesday, December 25, 2013

Liberals' Palin Erotomania

They still talk about her even though she's in a kind of semi-retired mode and not running for anything. Liberals get all stalkery about her when her biggest political aspiration these days is to take to Twitter. The Obsession even led Martin Bashir off the deep end who wanted to go all Gothic on her. It's a political psycho/sexual mystery far surpassing their Bachmann fetish.

78 comments:

  1. She's a media whore. Every time you hope she's gone for good she pops up spouting nonsense again somewhere. She's in denial about how irrelevant she really is.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. To the point where Martin Bashir wanted to urinate and defecate in her mouth and he called Michael Jackson a pervert!

      Delete
  2. Its the magnetism:
    "Her favorability rating in May of 2007, shortly after she took office, were 89%. She was the most popular Governor in the United States.
    However that popularity seemed to be based on rhetoric rather than performance. As Alaskans watched her actual performance her popularity began a dramatic decline, and it never rebounded. By April of 2011 she had only a 36% favorability rating.
    In July of 2012 only 29% of voters in Alaska had a positive feeling about Sarah Palin."

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. If you study politics that's a fairly common survey trend once somebody's been in office (see Obama).

      Delete
    2. You'll just say anything to protect her, won't you?

      Delete
    3. You act like I have a thing for her. From Day One liberals hated her and I've always wondered why. Theories abound - maybe it's because she didn't abort Trig, who knows?

      Delete
  3. Of course those are just polls.
    Like: "CNN poll: 88% approval rating for pope in US"

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. He's the feelgood pope like tomorrow he'll say you can touch yourself while toking your medicinal joint. Ratzinger by comparison was more a male version of the grandmother in "Flowers in the Attic."

      Delete
    2. Ratzinger is still around the Vatican someplace...they got an attic?

      Delete
    3. I still can't get over the fact you don't like the Pope. He's the best thing to hit the Church since BEFORE Vat II, the whole world has recognized and agreed to it, and you're just pissed off because he said it's time that the Church realizes there are other things to be concerned about besides abortion.

      Delete
    4. I simply don't agree with your follow-the-leader-no-matter-what-approach. In that case I may as well become a member of the sci-fis. Look if you're a socialist then he's your guy, I'm not so why does my view surprise you? The Church has always discussed and concerned itself with many other issues besides abortion so I'm saying his premise is wrong. Church teaching on abortion has developed and concretized over time, you can't just throw it out the window just because you're the pope. As I understand theology church teaching comes even before the pope and usually the pope goes along with it and follows it so it's never been an issue before. Also I'm not so sure the function of a spiritual leader is to say things people want to hear.

      Delete
  4. liberals are contributing to and will be the downfall of the United States of America.

    ReplyDelete
  5. And who’s to Blame?

    Conservatives tend to believe that the captains of industry are virtuous and that the government can’t be trusted.

    Liberals tend to believe that government servants are virtuous and that corporations can’t be trusted.

    But the truth is that psychopaths are psychopaths and Liberals are psychopaths… whether they’re in the private sector or government.

    And there is no such thing as representative government or free market capitalism anymore. Big corporate money has coopted the government; and ill-guided politicians have destroyed the free market.

    ReplyDelete
  6. I love blanket statements. They say so much about those who make them.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Kind of like your general views on conservatives (e.g. Duck). Conservatives can never misspeak or phrase things poorly, say things that can open themselves up to misinterpretation. It's always by nefarious design.

      Delete
  7. I nrver said negarious. I said it wasn't a first amendment violation.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Semantics and juxtaposition are not the same thing. In that case he also compared gay sex to infidelity, promiscuity and the word "the".

      Delete
    2. I'm in agreement with Jon Stewart's take on the whole Duck thing. If I may paraphrase and borrow from him if we can all be bumped from our jobs for saying ignorant shit how many of us would be left? Think about it.

      Delete
  8. Dammit. Nefarious. damn autocorrect.

    ReplyDelete
  9. And apparently Papi ain't saying much you personally wanna hear.

    ReplyDelete
  10. I can refer you to my mother, who says, "the Church is so hot about abortion and birth control but what about the pedophiles, that's okay? and always asking for money, like they have none. It's about time someone stopped talking and started doing."

    ReplyDelete
  11. Papal favorability rankings - I'm going to theorize here. A pope, any pope will probably have a higher positive rating than say a US President. Rank your local priest vs. the Mayor or City Hall. Has there ever been a bad Dalai Lama?

    ReplyDelete
  12. What's this got to do with anything? Are you discounting hispopularity? If he was stumping for your personal pet cause youd say he was the best thing since sliced bread.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. If you want to put it that way. A spiritual leader is usually of a high moral character so that's gonna be automatically built into a public poll on his popularity or favorability rating. The Dalai Lama is always gonna have a very positive ranking and yet you or I may differ from him politically. A fireman will probably be more popular than a police officer. A cop can give you a ticket or arrest you for a minor offense, a fireman is just saving lives. Now if the next pope had a couple of bumper stickers on the back of his Popemobile - "Ayn Rand Rocks" and "Who is John Galt?" - you two would look like you just ate a raw onion and you'd be going the other way saying the papacy is an archaic and anachronistic institution. Just explaining the mechanics of public polling and why you should cut me some slack.

      Delete
    2. In the interest of internet civility I'll cut you some slack. Everyone has their opinion and just about everyone has a different opinion. For example, IMO the papacy is archaic, but not anachronistic, for the former has been around a couple millennia and the latter has
      over a billion adherents. Color me doubtful any catholic clergy would be
      big Randians, though.

      Delete
    3. My bone with Francis is this -- stop acting like your political positions are all important parts of church teaching, this confuses the flock. Are Pope Francis' political views morally binding on the faithful? As long as he labels certain statements of his as these are my own political views as shaped by my faith I've no problem. Your link there while the sentiment is nice there are so many problems and I'm just gonna have to go with a no. I've never cared to read or comment at HuffPo anyway.

      Delete
    4. As near as I can ascertain from the available statements, he refers to
      economic views. It is we who assign politics to those economic views,
      not Francis.

      Delete
    5. IMO economics and politics are inextricably entwined. In other words you can't criticize a capitalistic free-market system without taking on the political foundations of that system. Put yet another way a totally laissez-faire economic system cannot exist in a country whose political system is communism or socialism. Francis to me seems to be for more government controls and that was the clear implication of his words at least for me.

      Delete
  13. Back to Ms. Palin; she came in 3rd in the 1984 Miss Alaska contest, was educated in Idaho and had Canadian healthcare as a child. So, she is an interesting persona.
    I'm still a little disconcerted that McCain picked her as VP candidate, though.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I've never fully understood the pick myself and in a way she overshadowed him after the pick. Maybe McCain was trying to shore up the erectile dysfunction crowd, dunno.

      Delete
    2. IMO, he was trying to shore up the hard right. He did...and lost the middle.

      Delete
    3. I don't actually agree here. Palin though a clear representative of the harder right didn't froth at the mouth and come across as a fire-breathing right-wing extremist. I think the middle which is key to most elections simply saw her as a dim bulb and didn't want her anywhere near foreign policy should something happen to a President McCain and let's face it he's no spring chicken.

      Delete

  14. Those of us who have had enough BS from the PC Police should be fed up with what these PC, liberals ass wipes are making out of this story on the beaded duck guy.
    Their hypocritical, narcissistic intolerance has gone too far with this case..
    They've jumped the shark with their race-baiting, language-manipulating, phony self esteem-building, forced inclusion silliness and it's clear that the pushback has begun.

    This IS about the 1st Amendment .. And It should NOT be about the hypocritical, paranoid, intolerant narcissism of the PC Police, and how they want to punish and intimidate people.
    The controversy over Duck Dynasty has little to do with just the Duck Dynasty. It's been building for a long time. It's all the, school children, the gun carriers, and yes the Gay communities hold on business like Chick Fil A etc. If the crap-ola continues it’s going to be the end of freedom as we know it. A guy shot his mouth off ...SO WHAT! What this is doing is giving credibility to the left and all of their double talking, double standards and hypocritical disposition.

    ReplyDelete
  15. Um... it won't be about the First Amendment until the United States Government takes action against Phil Robertson for what he said. To date, his First Amendment rights have in no way, shape, or form been violated. They don't apply between private parties (or employer/employee relationships)... they only apply between the government and the individual.

    I'm sorry you've been misunderstanding your Constitutional rights. I hope this helps.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Maybe this will help. If you write a letter-to-the-editor to your local paper expressing your opposition to gay marriage can your employer suspend or fire you?

      Delete
  16. It depends. Are you representing yourself as an employee or as a spokesman for the company? Do you work in a right to work state under 'at-will' employment? Are you a member of a union? Do you have a contract?

    All of these things bear nothing on the Constitution or on the First Amendment. That only applies to the government, not to private relationships or to employer/employee relations.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. First off Phil Robertson did not shout fire in a theater where everyone was watching The Wolf of Wall Street and he didn't say Richard Simmons had sex with a Great Dane. Was Phil Robertson representing himself as an employee or spokesman for A&E? Don't think so. You know when you watch a movie on DVD and go to the special features section and there's always that disclaimer Lionsgate or whomever does not necessarily share the views that may be expressed by the people being interviewed? I thought we had all this stuff worked out by now. It bears repeating that GQ interviewer asked him a direct question so was he not supposed to answer? are only pc responses allowed?

      Delete
  17. I mean do you want a legal real answer or a theoretical construct? In reality in a right to work state your employer needs NO reason to fire you. I am sure this man had a contract. I am equally sure A&E checked with their lawyers before calling him. There is no first amendment violation, there is only a man with a big mouth being disciplined by his employer. The law already precedent in this.country's allows employers to fire you if they dislike your opinions.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Your last sentence - I've lived on this Earth for almost 50 years and I didn't know that.

      Delete
  18. People have been fired for refusing to work on a holiday , helping customers , wearing wrong necktie , on your on your unpaid lunchbreak etc. ad nauseum. OK, so you are worried about the rights of this hirsute multimillionaire TV redneck..we understand.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I've never watched the show. It's more self-interest on my part, if they can come for him they can come for us my friend. Call it the Boomerang Effect.

      Delete
    2. Never seen it either. This 'they' that are coming after us...is that A&E Network. In which case you keep an eye out. Me, I'm avoiding places that encourage concealed carry.

      Delete
    3. I'm still trying to figure out why there's a hillbilly show on A&E like having Mother Angelica on the Playboy Channel.

      Delete
    4. Just about every cable channel has their top rated redneck series. Apparently popular with many viewers. I haven't figured out whether they want to live like that, or look down on the hillbillies. Boring and not educational, but there must be something about the genre.

      Delete
    5. Must be some leftover nostalgia for the Confederacy. They got any token blacks on those shows, some Scatman Crothers character at least delivering the mail?

      Delete
    6. We got Cajun Country from the delta and Highway to Hell from British Columbia. I'm waiting for 'Mayors of Toronto', ya know?

      Delete
  19. I see Eliot Spitzer has a new gal pal.

    ReplyDelete
  20. In brassville nc on new year's eve they drop a possum. Seriously.

    ReplyDelete
  21. Hey you there back in Idaho get with the gossip.

    ReplyDelete
  22. Drat! Another year older.

    ReplyDelete
  23. I feel like the older you get the faster Time goes like ff'ing a bad movie. At the end of my life I think I'll roughly calculate how many hours of purely nonproductive time I went through from being caught in traffic jams to being behind a food counter during an especially slow day and no manager says go home an hour early. Time is such a precious commodity and it's a limited amount although usually quite generous by the Creator but man those wasted hours you can't get back!!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Had nitrous one time at the dentist for a 2 hour session. My watch ran backwards, and I ran a red light upon leaving. Some people seem to just
      love dentist gas, but I've avoided it since.

      Delete
    2. & let's not forget that once upon a time PCP was a perfectly valid form of human anaesthesia.

      Delete
  24. Always running across stuff: found out the redneck series "Swamp People" where they bait and shoot alligaters in the bayous, prefer and have always used ammunition I had a part in making over the years. Add that to USAF Warthogs,
    coon hunters, 48 State Patrols, a couple of letter bombers, Interpol, US Army
    5.56 and 7.62, random poachers and a couple assassination attempts. Ya make
    the stuff, it goes out the door....

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. & you can hold your own in the Theology Dept. I'm impressed.

      Delete
  25. Saw on TV this morning that some of the western states that have legalized pot have stores sprouting up. They feature something for everyone, apparently:
    sugar free pot cookies, gluten-free marijuana jerky and some sort of peanut butter to make your morning toast zippier. Meanwhile, the few remaining Prince Albert
    smokers are taxed, castigated and avoided. (although the tobacco store says they
    STILL get kids asking if they have "Prince Albert In The Can"....What's next, pot
    martinis?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I've talked about the contradictory public health messages before - cigs (even e-cigs) evil/pot good. CO getting like the Netherlands.

      Delete
  26. From the standpoint of a chef, will we bee seeing pot garnish soon?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I've never had it, how does it taste? Wouldn't be surprised and the first chef to try it will probably be Nigella Lawson.

      Delete
    2. Dunno how it tastes. About the same as parsley? The Colorado shops had 4 hour lines. The mile high state- hash and assault rifles for all.

      Delete
  27. Because the only thing better than carrying your guns everywhere is being high and carrying your guns everywhere.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. That's your libertarian utopia. Clowns on angel dust at kiddie parties that's down the road.

      Delete
    2. & remember some people feel the blind should own guns too so picture a stoned Mr. Magoo type accidentally shooting up the Ayn Rand Public Library.

      Delete
  28. Rodman should be careful, his new BFF might one day feed him to the dogs.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Rodman took a whole team of retired NBA dudes. What the heck do they eat over there?

      Delete
    2. Apparently dog is a hot item on the N. Korean menu. Maybe at the end of this year People magazine can name Kim the Sexiest Man of the Year. I know he's been angling for this for awhile and as Adam Levine said let's give George Clooney a rest.

      Delete
  29. I dont get why it's ok to eat one animal but not another.dog, pig, what is the difference really?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I can't really argue with you but I think it's an emotional pet thing. Dogs and cats are pets for much of the globe so it's kinda like incest.

      Delete
    2. Can it be true that when Kissinger first visited Red China, he enjoyed the
      welcoming banquet, turned to Chinese dignitary and asked, regarding the roast, "Quack quack? The English-challenged notable smiled and replied with another onomatopoeia, "Oh...Bow-bow".

      Delete
    3. I never heard that one. As I recall ole Hitch wasn't a Kissinger fan.

      Delete
    4. Kissinger is the only Kissinger fan. On the topic of Dog eating, we note that when the Lewis & Clark party descended out of the mountains into
      Idaho, they were frozen and starved. The Nez Perce fed them well from
      their cuisine of dried roots and smoked salmon. They quickly grew tired
      (and sick) from that, so Clark, who craved red meat, arranged to buy puppies from the locals. They were happy to oblige, thinking the strange
      white men to be animal lovers; but horrified to see them butcher the pups
      and roast them on a fire. At the next palaver, an enraged warrior threw
      a little puppy in Clark's face, shouting in Salish something about low-life
      dog eater. Clark leaped to his feet, drawing his sword and only fast talking by Lewis, through Charbonneau, through Sacejewa, though a
      Shoshone visitor, averted the first western Little Bighorn. Sort of a
      unique cultural reversal.

      Delete
  30. So, you think Palin and Bachmann are cousins?

    ReplyDelete
  31. They both got that crazy gene from somewhere.

    ReplyDelete
  32. Maybe as kids they were locked up together in an attic somewhere.

    ReplyDelete