It was one of those nonissues during the campaign and Romney didn't have much to say on the matter either. I'm talking of course about guns and not the well-to-do on which there were plenty of thoughts. I'm kinda more concerned lately with the threat posed by guns in society and not so much on those individuals/families/entities making more than $250,000/yr. not paying their fair share. There was lately a shootup in some mall in Portland, OR. Before that there was of course the Batman/Movie Theater Massacre in Aurora CO. There was most recently some weird guy who shot and killed three Brooklyn shopkeepers and he said the CIA put him up to it and then just the other day the brazen Midtown Hitman attack in broad daylight in NYC this in probably one of the most heavily surveilled cities in the world today. Just today at about 9:30 in the morning a 20-yr. old gunman opened fire on a couple of first-grade classrooms in an elementary school in bucolic Newtown CT killing 26 people including 20 children. The gunman is now deceased but he was armed with three firearms and wore a bulletproof vest. Historically it ranks as the second deadliest massacre after VA Tech and Newtown is quite close to the Danbury Mall so there are alot of open questions about the gunman's motivations/psychology here and why he chose a helpless group of first-graders instead of the usual throng of Christmas shoppers.
My position on guns and gun control is rather complex and I've enough to say on the matter to piss off both sides. I'm not against all gun control measures, would probably support many of them but also recognize their limited effectiveness. Liberals talk as if this is the magical solution, would that this were so. Put simply only honest law-abiding people obey laws, criminals don't that's why they're known as criminals in the first place. Pass all the gun control measures you want and criminals will still get ahold of guns and continue to maim and kill, that's basic existential reality. I could fill a whole blogpage with my thoughts on the subject and they ramble in all political directions at times but bottom line is Obama seems to care more about the wealthy these days and the apparent threat they pose to the country. I wish he were just as concerned about the prevalence of guns in our society but we can't have that discussion right now because of the Fiscal Cliff. Obama if he were a more mature and reasoned leader, not still running a campaign could have helped put all that behind us and on to more pressing matters like, say Guns in Our Society and I'd like to hear President Obama's response on the tragedy in Newtown CT and also what his mouthpiece Jay Carney has to say I mean if they have the time since the wealthy are taking up so much of their attention lately. There will be the usual obligatory pro-forma statements of course but you would think they would at least question some of their own political obsessions/fixations of late, sober up. The poor will always be with us and so will the wealthy and there will always be time for those discussions but the dead remain the dead.
Your thoughts? (and don't be surprised if I might agree with you at times).