Sunday, March 13, 2016

In addition to the great polyp hunt...

I wish the nation's doctors would band together and declare the mandated time change is unhealthy.  With more and more people questioning it it's well past time to abandon it.

15 comments:

  1. Agreed. There are numerous pros and cons and probably most of us fall on the con side. I have a living room clock that
    adjusts itself for DST. But it is older and uses DST dates from several years back, so it changes when it shouldn't and
    doesn't when it should.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I don't know what Trump's position is. I woke up at 5 this morning and couldn't get back to sleep. Every once in a while our legislators should look at our laws and sweep out the anachronisms.

    ReplyDelete
  3. In the terminal ballistics department, we note a long and ongoing discussion about the relative efficacy of 9mm vs
    45 ACP ammo. The usual upshot is that 9mm is preferable
    in terms of rounds/weapon, recoil (and often accuracy) and
    is generally the weapon of choice between the two. Many,
    though, believe the 45 ACP has more terminal impetus and greater wound power; it is the handgun of choice against a
    charging grizzly. Last week a pastor north of here was shot
    practically point blank by a deranged ex-marine. The 45
    auto left him with eight bullets in him. 1 in the lung,
    2 in the hip, 1 in the face, 3 in the shoulder and 1 in the head. He survived and will be back in church. Either the
    pastor has upstairs help, or the weapon is over rated. The
    handgun community continues their theoretical debate.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. 45 ACP does pack a punch. From what I've heard many departments have gone back to 9mm because the cost of ammo is cheaper though if everyone's jumping to 9mm I can't see that lasting too long.

      .40 is a good caliber as well and works well as a personal carry with the Taurus Slim 740.

      I've also got a full frame Taurus 24/7 in 9mm. That holds many more rounds but being a full frame it is a bit much as a personal carry.

      Delete
    2. Back in the day, when I was researching primer explosives, we came up with a formula which because of the initiator change was faster than current primers. But it tested well across the typical range of pistols our ballistics department had on
      hand (about 15-20, as I recall). So we made a trial
      run to send out to police agencies using different
      service weapons. They were well received by all except the Royal Canadian Mounties. They reported back laughing, that the bullets came out so slow you could see them dropping to the ground about 20
      feet away! Embarrassed and dumbfounded, we asked what weapons they used. Revolvers, S&W model 10
      .38 special: so, we hauled one out of supply and sure enough, the trajectory was short, slow and pathetic. It took a high speed camera to find that
      most of the energy was exiting the cylinder gap. A
      bit more study found that the primer was so fast that the bullet was out of the forcing cone and past
      the gap before most of the propellant had ignited:
      not a problem in most weapons, except that particular revolver design/characteristics. The fix was one of those marketing delights: the entire
      primer charge was reduced by 35% so it worked in all weapons and cost less to make. I'm still a bit
      embarrassed, though.

      Delete
  4. I like that it gets darker later. We go to bed so early that it doesn't matter much but I like it anyway. I never understand why people have problems with it.

    Guns are verboten around here. No one who actively hallucinates and/or experiences psychotic episodes should be allowed to access lethal weapons.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I like the later light but for the first few days I feel rushed. You look at the clock at night and you're like it's that time already?

      Delete
  5. And here I was thinking I'd launch a gun control debate.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I've thrown out topics from time to time that nobody even nibbles at, they just sit there.

      Delete
  6. Back on 'the Great Polyp Hunt', the main driver with the scope is to locate and do a pathology on the polyps:
    Adenomatous polyps (adenomas): These polyps sometimes change into cancer. Because of this, adenomas are called a pre-cancerous condition. 95% of colon cancers derive from these.
    Hyperplastic polyps and inflammatory polyps: These polyps are more common, but in general they are not pre-cancerous.
    In addition, the area beneath the polyp is studied for
    dysplastic cell growth, some times an indication of pre
    cancerous activity. While imaging and blood testing are
    indicative, microscopic histology is axiomatic and conclusive. That is why I am reluctantly going in for my
    third next month despite being 3/4 century old. I like the data so much, I one time complained that I wasn't permitted
    to help the pathologists with their confocal microscopy. :)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I have long considered that I should have a separate colonoscopy blog.

      Delete
    2. Good idea. I haven't come up with a catchy name,
      though. Sigmoid, polyp, scope, propofol and purge
      don't seem likely to attract the usual crowd. Oh,
      something like 'Stranded in the Netherworld'?
      dunno, Z-Man

      Delete
    3. At 75 you're really on the cusp of they shouldn't be bothering you anymore. Barring unusually important circumstances it really does become abuse of the elderly imo.

      Delete
    4. Have you considered negotiating a deal with your
      Dr.? If he cures your tinnitus, you would get a
      colonoscopy, say. BTW, how's the new job compare
      with the old?

      Delete
    5. I have often thought of that deal and think it a good one. The new job is farther to travel to so when your sleep is inconsistent...same work as the old job but 10X more. It's ok that I'm working but I don't have the same emotional attachment as to the old job.

      Delete