Saturday, April 05, 2008

Talking and shilling

Time was talk radio was the new kid on the block, unwelcome by the liberal msm for counterbalancing their liberal bias, but it's like it became so infatuated with itself and its political influence it began losing sight of its original goal. Rush was fresh and funny when he first started out, his political parodies were first-rate but now he's just a rubber-stamp for everything Bush especially on the immigration problem. And as for Sean, well a week or so ago a caller called up asking him but what about McCain's own pastor problem and while Sean didn't dismiss such concerns outright he downplayed it by drawing a sharp line of distinction between Obama's own pastor problem and McCain's, his reasoning being that the Rev. John Hagee isn't McCain's personal minister/spiritual advisor but this misses the point imo. By his warm acceptance of Hagee's endorsement he is saying, even if this wasn't his intent, that we should be tolerant of intolerance but Sean, like Rush, has become a shill for a party and a president. Re the Iraq war you should be for the war not because Sean tells you you should be for it, this ain't thinking, but because in your heart you're for it, make sense? and you should also not have such a closed mental universe, political solipsism if you will, that you can't accept the fact that people have political differences about everything under the sun. There are still many good pockets of talk radio still worth listening to, Laura Ingraham's at the top of my list, but I think a good part of it has outlived and outdone itself, intoxicated with its own power, its hackneyed use of the formula the Democrats can do no right and the Republicans can do no wrong. I don't listen to much of it in the car anymore, I have my preset music stations and when they grind the same playlist into the ground everyday I fall back on my CD player. I check out Hannity only on a very occasional basis and it's always SO-SO (same old same old) or SS-DD as people like to say at work.

7 comments:

  1. I dunno, I suppose plain old objective commentary doesn't result in good ratings.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I'm not against having a point of view, rant on, but at what point does it become pure shilling for a party or a president? There are times when I think Sean doesn't like himself, it's like deep down he knows what he's doing, just my opinion. Closed mental universes, like he can't accept the fact that somebody might not be a liberal and still oppose the war, a bang your head against the wall type of conservative if you will. It ain't discussion in my book.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Maybe he feels it's expected of him, like that is what people want to hear from him.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Maybe but it's like with him if the war goes on for another 20 years or so he'll still be like "just give us more time, we're making progress, the Democrats are undermining this thing." I fear he's pigeonholing himself kinda like Vincent Price only doing horror movies.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Usually people in politics don't give absolutes, they want to hedge their bets, so for Sean to be so bold may indeed pigeonhole him for life.

    ReplyDelete
  6. He kinda strikes me as your straight missionary guy. His last book "Deliver Us From Evil" wasn't half bad though.

    ReplyDelete
  7. OK, Sean is Sean, we'll let it be.

    ReplyDelete