Tuesday, June 02, 2009

The roots of violence

Here's what it is in a nutshell, moral relativism and it even applies to the man who shot abortionist George Tiller to death. As I said at Kris's Elephant blog when you condone the killing of even late-term unborn babies you set up yet another exception to Thou Shalt Not Kill and then someone might decide the next exception is YOU, it's moral relativism turned on itself. Man as a rational creature (don't laugh) cannot choose evil for evil's sake, it has to be rationalized first as a good and in the case of violence the person doing the violence feels he is enforcing a moral code. Enforcement of a moral code is at the roots of modern-day violence and the person doing the killing feels the moral code being enforced is about absolute Right and Wrong. When Boston lawyer Tom Capano killed his lover Anne Marie Fahey who wanted to break it off with him he killed her and is now awaiting the death sentence (see the bestseller And Never Let Her Go by Ann Rule). Here's how he can more than live with himself and bide his time in prison, he believes in his heart of hearts she deserved her fate, by spurning him she was violating some type of moral code, a kind of absolute and universal code of we should be together forever and in the case of true sociopaths like Capano and O.J. Simpson it's not enough to believe in this moral code which many of us may believe in too but here's the difference. Most of us might accept the moral code of don't break my heart or it's wrong to kill unborn babies but in the mind of the socio this moral code needs to be enforced, it's a kind of karmic necessity, a cosmic balancing of the Scales of Justice so no matter that Tiller's killer believed in the absolute moral code of it's wrong to take the life of the unborn, he acted like a relativist for acting this out. You can't go there, it is what it is and only God can judge Tiller. For me anyway this is not debateable and one of my cardinal rules is once you throw up something for debate over time it will become morally defensible, we don't debate the pros and cons of rape for instance. Kind of a disturbing beginning of the week all around.

4 comments:

  1. There is no moral compass anymore, it's like anything goes, the ends justify the means. I mean seriously, a moral compass is as easy as the Golden Rule.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Here's the real danger of moral relativism, it has nothing to build on. It can't keep you safe.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Unless you are the one in charge. Which is why today I questioned at my blog if libs would feel the same way about bailouts if McCain was in office. Oh sure, the libs like legislating morality when it's the crap they think is "moral" but if it has to do with gay marriage or something conservatives care about, then it's all "get out of my bedroom" crap.

    They forget it works both ways, so moral relativism as you point out can turn on itself.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Basically my point is that Tiller was the victim of moral relativism which is ironic when you stop to think about it. He didn't think the viable fetuses he aborted had any value and someone didn't think his life had any value and that's what you get in a world without moral absolutes. BTW you're probably right in your point at your blog but nobody will ever admit it. Yeah you are right because liberals got on Bush's case when he bailed out or nationalized the banks but they ain't doing the same with the Historic President.

    ReplyDelete