Tuesday, October 27, 2009

The politics of the Breast

A theme is going to be emerging here, actually it has poked its head up already in the past and I didn't really go looking for it. God knows I'm a busy man but for me it's almost a certitude and it's this:

There is a cultural, a societal preference in favor of the Woman. Her needs, her emotions, her overall health, her general wellbeing is of paramount importance and her perspective is almost accepted without question.

It's happened within practically the last few months, the Breast Cancer Movement. It's everywhere you go. Take supermarkets. Boar's Head has the pink ribbon thing down pat including pink deli caps for the ladies although I suppose men can wear them too and so you pass the deli and then you see just up ahead a big bin of Breast Cancer Balls for $9.99 each. In the bakery section you see a setup on a table of pink roses in vases and pink cupcakes and then when you're paying for your stuff the cashier asks you if you'd like to donate a buck to you guessed it but let's stop right here and pull this rig over for a minute.

There's nothing at all wrong with any of this. I was in a food store just the other day and forked over my dollar, WTH? there's a collective feel-goodism about it all and you're making a difference at the same time but where are all the prostate cancer displays? Where are the brown ribbons? where is the symbol of the whole Prostate Cancer Movement? (perhaps something to do with a finger, I leave that to your imagination). OF ALL the forms of cancer why is the Breast the thing? If I as a man give to Breast Cancer Research because it's socially required, politically necessary am I not slighting my own sex?

The theme I highlighted above will be a recurring theme throughout my blog now (that's a leitmotif for you people in Rio Linda California). Even when women do wrong or go bad it's treated differently. 'Member Lisa Nowak the astronut? initial reaction to her even among male commentators expressed more than a nod of understanding (yeah Sean). Most recently Steve Phillips' stalker, Brooke Hundley, well put it this way, everyone knows her elevator is stuck between the 4th and 5th floors but at worst it's treated in appropriate comedic fashion whereas the men stalkers most recently in the News of late were treated with the Utmost Seriousness, don't recall any jokes from the Jay. On the workfront I've noticed the workers most likely to be fired or at least ripped a new one are Men and this happens on a fairly regular basis. A woman could suck, a female boss can be atrocious but it's overlooked, there are really no repercussions and it took me a while to figure this one out in my own jobs but women are special although this won't be posted on the breakroom bulletin board as official policy. It all goes back to the movies from the olden days, women have that special aura, due to the nature of their sex men give them deference, men want to protect them etc. etc. Humphrey Bogart. It's why Mother's Day has always been a bigger day than Father's Day. Men just ejaculate and then roll over and go to sleep, women have to deal with the rest. Pro-choicers will deny this to the max of course but the act of feticide is really a political statement although they could just as easily make this statement by urging the woman to have the kid and then sue for child support but somehow this is better.

If you want to call this a masculinist screed go right on ahead, call me a male Andrea Peyser if you like but it's time Bill O'Reilly devoted a whole hour to a discussion of the Politics of the Breast. Devote a whole show to the prostate too, Bill could even bend over on the air not for titillation's sake, oh no, but to show the seriousness, the utmost gravity of the i-shoo. Somewhere deep deep down you know I'm right.

26 comments:

  1. True, our attitude towards our health is a gender thing ...

    ReplyDelete
  2. That's an interesting squib but the case can also be made how are we to get men to change their habits when there's not the same amount of attention paid to their cancers as there are to women's? I blogged about prostate exams way back when, said it should be up to the guy who does it THEN and only then would you see men going to the doctor's more often.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Of course I'm looking at it culturally here, cultural reasons why we're so big on breast cancer and not the prostate. I wanna get some brown roses rocking and some brown deli caps. Breasts have a unique and hallowed place in Society, women get them inflated after all and they wouldn't do this if they didn't feel it were unimportant. The other place is dark, it's like a cave in a bad dream and dunno, I think it's a confluence of Things.

    ReplyDelete
  4. We're men and we like boobs. It's in our interest to do whatever necessary to save them. I'd much rather think about saving boobs than a misplaced finger but I dunno man maybe that's just me.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Say it man! Let's face it Jenna Jameson getting breast cancer would somehow be considered more tragic to millions of men than if Rudy got it again. Are things this simple??? sometimes they are. Geez soapie I was just ready to logoff and get ready for work bro!

    ReplyDelete
  6. Even Howard Stern apparently feels the Issue is that important.

    ReplyDelete
  7. For the record, men CAN get breast cancer.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Here's another point. My husband has the same argument over why we Irish get a big parade and around here some schools even close on St. Patrick's Day because quite frankly many kids took off that day to go to the Parade so the schools just gave in.

    For both St. Patrick's Day and Breast Cancer awareness efforts I say they simply have excellent PR departments, and if you would like to get your nationality a big parade or your disease of choice some major attention, then get out and just DO IT, but don't sit back and complain if someone else doesn't.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Soapie, you crack me up!

    ReplyDelete
  10. I was driving behind a pickup truck about a month back and they had a trailer hitch cover with a pink ribbon on it and it said "Save the Ta Tas".

    Who can argue with that?

    ReplyDelete
  11. But Beth the point I'm making is almost inarguable and that's in many ways the culture sees the Woman and her health and concerns as more important than those of Men. It's kind of the reverse of the usual feminist point, in fact they have it all wrong imo. If you want to understand me I'm the much older-type conservative who says things that even more modern conservatives won't touch, kind of a rare find.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Let's take someone who's an objective observer of the Culture, let's say he or she's lived in a cave for the past several years and have them make notes when they join Society back up again, hell let's have a team of them. I daresay they'd find it quite glaring the whole attention devoted to diseases of the Breast. Our fictitious team would probably come up with different explanations, the sexual importance of the Breast in modern culture for instance. Some would feel like me and take the masculinist position if you will that men are disposable and that deaths from prostate cancer isn't somehow as tragic as deaths from breast cancer. All I'm saying is that culturally the sheer attention devoted to the subject of breast cancer is quite obvious, it kind of grabs your attention even if you're not looking for these things. Another issue to drive home the point, rape. Hardly any attention is devoted to prison rape but then again they're prisoners although I read one statistic once that prison rape is actually more common than rape as we usually understand it. Sexual harassment and domestic violence, again mainly women's issues.

    ReplyDelete
  13. I also think it goes beyond just having a good PR firm. This helps of course but the larger issue I'm making is it just dovetails with the culture and society right now for some reason. I really don't think if there was some stellar PR firm for the prostate cause that you'd be seeing this stuff in stores and when you're out and about. It's literally EVERYWHERE. The best PR firm still has to represent a cause that's dear to Society's heart and here I believe they've found it.

    ReplyDelete
  14. My concern is that the money that is drummed up for the cause is diverted less and less towards it.

    ReplyDelete
  15. It's about raising awareness and money and its not the American Cancer Society doing it, they deal with all cancers, but the Susan G. Komen foundation, and breast cancer is their mission. So instead of knocking them for doing an awesome job getting corporate partners, why not emulate their efforts for prostate cancer?

    ReplyDelete
  16. Hey I think these women have us beat Z!!!

    http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,569770,00.html?test=latestnews

    ReplyDelete
  17. If conservatives can hold the line on this nationalized health care stuff, I want it all to come full circle and I want to see conservative-based healthcare reform brought forward to the Senate/House. Let the Democrats either back free-market principles or showcase their socialist agenda once and for all!

    ReplyDelete
  18. if you want prostate cancer awareness you must organize-coalesce get spokesmen and written backing and the new media... -
    -a legitimate movement starts with an idea and grows...
    breast cancer awareness did not occur 'over-night' ..
    go for it guys!!! - --prostate cancer awareness - that is....

    ReplyDelete
  19. I did a little research to see the cancer rates of breast and prostrate cancers, in 2007 there were actually more cases of prostrate cancer than breast cancer (they were the top two new cases for men and women respectively), however more women died from breast cancer than men of prostrate cancer. But either way, you have a good point that prostrate cancer should get more press based on that fact.

    Of course for men and women, LUNG related cancers are the deadliest, even though they were second on the list for new cases.

    ReplyDelete
  20. a classic z diatribe

    ReplyDelete
  21. Folks are missing the point. Breast Cancer Awareness took off because of a culture that values women's needs, emotions and overall health and wellbeing more than men, there's no getting around it. That's the premise of this blog and I'll keep steering people back to it if I have to.

    ReplyDelete
  22. Re the Susan G. Komen Foundation Beth said: "So instead of knocking them for doing an awesome job getting corporate partners why not emulate their efforts for prostate cancer?"

    Nobody's knocking them, I say simply the culture needs to change. I guess you have to be a man to see where I'm coming from. When all you see out there are pink ribbons and breast cancer displays practically everywhere you go and none dealing with prostate cancer or cancer of the balls, well put it this way it seems more than slightly sexist to me, as a man it hurts and sends a social message. How 'bouts Boar's Head and all those supermarket chains start putting up some prostate cancer displays pronto! it doesn't start with having a good PR firm and spokesmen, it starts with the attitude that men count too.

    ReplyDelete
  23. You can try to steer it, but I stand by my point that is nobody is saying you can't do something to promote prostrate cancer, unless you do then don't knock the women who have done so with breast cancer.

    ReplyDelete
  24. If you start a campaign, I will be the first one to buy whatever product you sell to do so.

    ReplyDelete
  25. Yes Beth but it sends a message. It shouldn't have to be me. Let's say I owned a food store or department store and one month we did breast cancer, well it would be natural for me to say next month we're gonna do something for a disease that afflicts men or maybe that's just me, I'm not with the times.

    ReplyDelete